![]() While apt does have some similar command options as apt-get, it’s not backward compatible with apt-get. Difference between apt and apt-get commands apt enables them by default and takes the pain away. You can achieve the same with apt-get as well if you use additional command options. On top of that, it enables a few options by default that is actually helpful for the end users.įor example, you get to see the progress bar while installing or removing a program in apt.Īpt shows the number of packages that can be upgraded It has fewer but sufficient command options but in a more organized way. When Debian says “pleasant for end users”, it actually means that. The main aim of apt is to provide an efficient way of handling package in a way “pleasant for end users”. You won’t be lost under tons of command options. So with apt, you get all the necessary tools in one place. apt is more structured and provides you with necessary options needed to manage packages.īottom line: apt=most common used command options from apt-get and apt-cache. With apt, you don’t have to fiddle your way from apt-get commands to apt-cache. apt consists some of the most widely used features from apt-get and apt-cache leaving aside obscure and seldom used features. The apt commands have been introduced to solve this problem. On the other hand, the most commonly used package management commands are scattered across apt-get and apt-cache. You see, these commands are way too low level and they have so many functionalities which are perhaps never used by an average Linux user. ![]() If you have read my guide on apt-get commands, you might have come across a number of similar commands such as apt-cache. ![]() Another popular tool is Aptitude with both GUI and command-line options. apt-get is one such command-line tool which is widely popular. There are various tools that interact with APT and allow you to install, remove and manage packages in Debian based Linux distributions. Don’t confuse it with the command apt, it’s not the same. Debian uses a set of tools called Advanced Packaging Tool (APT) to manage this packaging system. Why apt was introduced in the first place?ĭebian, mother Linux of distributions like Ubuntu, Linux Mint, elementary OS etc, has a robust packaging system and every component and application is built into a package that is installed on your system. This apt which we are discussing here is not the same as the one in Linux Mint.īefore we see the difference between apt and apt-get, let’s go into the backdrop of these commands and what exactly they try to achieve. A few years ago, Linux Mint implemented a python wrapper called apt that actually uses apt-get but provides more friendly options. I’ll explain all these questions in this article and I hope that by the end of this article, you’ll have a clearer picture. You might be wondering what’s the difference between apt-get and apt? And if they have a similar command structure, what was the need for the new apt command? You might also be thinking if apt is better than apt-get? Should you be using the new apt command or stick with the good old apt-get commands? It became common to see apt install package instead of the usual apt-get install package. Eventually, many other distributions followed Ubuntu’s footsteps and started to encourage users to use apt instead of apt-get. The reality is that the first stable version of apt was released in the year 2014 but people started noticing it in 2016 with the release of Ubuntu 16.04. One of the noticeable new features of Ubuntu 16.04 was the ‘introduction’ of apt command. It also lists some of the most commonly used apt commands that replace the older apt-get commands. Brief: This article explains the difference between apt and apt-get commands of Linux.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |